3. Factors of employee turnover

 



Lack of opportunities to grow

        Sheehan (2014) identifies that lack of opportunities for the employees that secure their career growth would lead to decline in the productivity falls and the increase in the rate of turnover of employees. According to firm specific human capital theory, an organization is able to promote the concept of learning-by-doing and its accumulation would remain positively related to staff turnover in an organization.  The majority of employees desire to be able to advance in their jobs and improve their quality of life. There is a strong desire among them to continue to learn and grow. Their ambitions include being able to take on a variety of duties and progressing up the corporate ladder in their careers. If they are unable to grow, develop, or advance in their current business or organization, there is a danger that they will quit that firm or organization. Employees who have the option to advance in their professions are more likely to remain with a company in the long run. A retention plan that does not provide opportunities for professional progress is pointless. Larson (2004) argues that professional advancement puts workers beneath pressure to evaluate the value of their career opportunities.

Workplace stressors such as growth roadblocks may arise at whichever point throughout an implied contract. Stressful situations may involve a wide range of issues, such as being trapped in a job with no prospects for advancement or the possibility of retrenchment (Smith and Cooper, 1994). Studies published by the Chartered Management Institute (CMI) has shown that an important percentage of workers are unhappy with their current level of professional progression and believe that they have been never progressing at the rate that they really want it to be. According to a firm that operates in collecting statistics on worker performance and involvement, just 26 % who responded to a questionnaire thought they had appropriate chances for professional development. The supervisors of those very same workers were much more enthusiastic, stating that: 50 percent of managers who responded to the questionnaire said that businesses provided appropriate opportunities for professional growth. However, career development chances in south Asian nations are weaker than in other countries, resulting in workers leaving the organization despite the fact that they have received training and are working a full-time schedule there.


Lack of feedback and recognition

The strategic human resource management theory expressed by Scholes (2012) indicates that employees who have been provided with adequate recognition and responses from the management or the leadership of an organization are resistant to be subjected to any form of turnover since they have created a positive mindset on the organization through recognition and responses. This stance is very well supported by the research findings of Steins (2014), Jackson & Myers (2015) and James (2016) since all the studies reiterate on the correlation between employee recognition and employee turnover.

There are three main reasons for staff turnover in the Philippines:


Lack of a defined career path

49%

Poor morale

32%

Lack of feedback and recognition

31%

                                                                                         Table 1 - Reasons for Turnover in the Philippines    

Source: Lipman (2019)

Workers are clearly in need of chances to grow and improve their performance, even as the epidemic spreads. Having to replace employees costs your firm money and causes production to lag while new team members are acquired and trained. Identifying probable reasons of high turnover, such as a lack of recognition for your personnel, might assist your organization in making adjustments to its operations. Understanding the consequences of acknowledging and responding to employee concerns and successes is important for avoiding employee turnover. The degree of recognition received from the company's senior management team has an impact on the company's atmosphere, morale, and employee happiness while on duty. Employees in the banking industry in Southeast Asia are less likely to feel appreciated since their employers have neglected to recognize their efforts. It is impossible to know whether or not an employee's performance is satisfactory in the absence of feedback. As a result of concerns being brushed off, employees may come to believe that management is just concerned with producing money. Employees begin to doubt their position within the organization as well as their prospects for the future. It is critical to recognize and provide feedback following training at a banking center since a company where positive feedback and helpful comments are encouraged results in contented workers. Employees that are satisfied with their jobs are more productive. Taking the time to recognize people and teams may help them to feel more confident, foster cooperation, increase loyalty, and improve general morale inside the organization. According to a survey, 36 % cared deeply about acknowledgement to say this was "the number one reason they were contemplating moving employment."

The above statistic comes from December 2017 research conducted by Achievers, a business that specializes in employee satisfaction (Lipman, 2019). It's a straightforward discovery having significant ramifications. Recognizability is one of those core managerial duties that, to be honest, is not always managed properly by people in charge.


Poor employee selection

 
Figure 1 - Global Employment and Social Change (2018)

Figure 1 - Global Employment and Social Change (2018)

Source: ILO (2018)


The above map shows the outlook for Global Employment and Social Change in 2018: Employment in Asia-Pacific continues to rise, but it's still characterized by low quality (ILO, 2018). Employing the wrong candidates can even have severe consequences - this will not only undermine the self-esteem of an entire team and negatively impact the interaction of such employees, but it can also result in higher levels of disengagement, a negative impact on customer relations, a reduction in job performance, and eventually a reduction in sales and profits. In addition to having a negative effect on performance, recruiting the incorrect applicant may have a negative impact on your bottom line. When replacing an employee who is not performing up to expectations, the company will incur additional costs in addition to paying his or her compensation. Additionally, the company will incur additional costs in conducting a second recruiting process (IceHrm, 2020). It is impossible for banks to be successful even if they just invest in the development of its present personnel via the basis of learning and upskilling training. However, enhancing the recruiting process is obviously a requirement for financial institutions. According to a recent article on the McKinsey Leadership & Organization blog, firms throughout sectors are expanding the nets in order to find talented employees.
Examine the organization's goal and beliefs to verify that any new recruiting practices are consistent with both. To help better understand candidates for desirable attributes, the organization should define what a satisfied employee appears as, conduct controlled experiments, monitor the results and adjust the process over time in order to constantly enhance the candidates’ evaluations, according to the report. It is indeed critical to create an inclusive work environment that values and welcomes differences and a wide range of backgrounds in order to achieve success. New workers may not welcome feedback inside the business if they do not work in an atmosphere that fosters diversity and recognizes the accomplishments of candidates from a diversity of perspectives. This is especially more important when it comes to employing individuals who have a criminal record or have a history of being humiliated in the workplace. Since these applicants are much more able to adhere around, it's easier to predict a company's success based on their aptitude and personal characteristics. It is impossible even for the most skilled and smarter and better to thrive in a job that does not fit their talents, capabilities, and preferences. Each will have their own unique set of skills and abilities, and they will do optimally in jobs that allow them to use those skills and resources to their full potential (Chester, 2017).


Overworked issues

There has been a 29% rise in deaths by work-related causes since 2000 according to research undertaken by the World Health Organization and the International Labor Organization. Functioning over 55 hours a week is linked to a 35% increased risk of stroke and a 17% increased risk of death from heart attacks, according to research. According to the findings, the majority of fatalities occurred among adults aged 60 to 79 who had worked more than 55 hours per week while they were between the ages of 45 and 74, according to the research (ICHIMURA, 2021)

Figure 2 - Deaths due to Long working hours

Figure 2 - Deaths due to Long working hours

Source: When I Work Organization (2022)


The rivalry for employment has increased as a result of the globalization of employment. There are now more job options available now than there ever has been. Nevertheless, there are indeed a large number of people who are interested in such prospects. As a response, employers are well aware that workers would not quickly leave their jobs, even if they have been overloaded. Workers, on the other hand, are concerned that employees will not have the same opportunity for a career in the future. As a consequence, many individuals are stressed and experiencing exhaustion as a result of these issues. Overloaded personnel are those that labor far beyond the physical and mental capabilities for longer time frames in respective jobs. Increased workloads may create discomfort, which can then cause emotional exhaustion. There seems to be an overwhelming number of workers that are pressured and underappreciated in the banking sector of South Asia. Excessive workload often leads to serious health conditions and unhealthy behaviors throughout the long run. Overstressed workers may suffer from melancholy, alcoholism, a lack of sleep and forgetfulness, poor cognitive abilities, as well as an increased risk of heart disease and diabetes over a period. Overworked people often suffer from exhaustion, sleep deprivation, and a weakened immune system. Working too hard also has a severe effect on health outcomes, as well as on company work and overall personal affairs. Sooner or later, overall performance would begin to decline (When I Work Organization, 2022))


Rewards and benefits 

In addition to salary, incentives and benefits will become effective for retention policy when it provides sustainable, pay and benefits in par with the market motivating workers to be loyal to the company (Lockwood and Walton, 2008). A research by Mercer (2003) states, if they are paid, workers may stay in an organization and they will also turnover when they are negatively rewarded. Staffs tends to remain in companies when their talents, achievements and hard work (Davies, 2001).

Gomez-Mejia et al., (2004) highlighted that if the payment plan is used as the retention strategy, internal and external equity should be reviewed in terms of remuneration. Pillay (2009) conducted a study on nurses and found that in order to improve employee retention, monetary and non-monetary incentives are significant. Monetary benefits have been reported to improve employee retention dramatically, including performance incentives, fair compensation, and scarce skills remuneration. Promotions, child care services, extended leave and leisure facilities were part of the non-monetary benefits. Nurses have also been reported to consider salary as the primary source of discontent that has often contributed to high turnover of employees (Pillay, 2009). As main factors affecting their decision to leave South Africa, South African trained nurses who migrated overseas also cited financial justification (Oosthuizen, 2005). In comparison, Cappelli (2001) argues that companies are now facing difficulties in separating themselves from their rivals by remuneration due to the recent trend towards benchmarking, thus reducing the effect of financial incentives on employee retention. However, despite several studies reporting that financial incentives are a weak motivational factor, remuneration packages continue to be a strategy used by many companies to increase employee engagement (Lee et al., 2001). 


Working conditions 

The fifth European Conditions of Working Survey (Eurofound, 2012), carried out across 34 countries with a sample strength of 44,000 labours, revealed the importance of working relationships in their respective individual lives. As per this report, the exposure to bodily risks at where you work has not reduced since 1991 and in the present socio-economic situation, which segregates high demands, job strengthening, lack of independence, inadequate societal relations and a sense of self-doubt towards work, psychosocial risks may show negative health consequences. Several studies have shown that individual, organizational, social and sectoral costs may be the collateral properties of such job pressure and psychosocial hazards (Hoel et al., 2001). Specifically, 20% of employees claimed underprivileged psychological well-being and 18% of employees report deprived work-life balance. In addition, Eurofound report points out that there are minimal improvements in working environments over the last two decades and the fact that certain classes of employees appear to be affected negatively by unfavourable working conditions.

The relations between bad working environments and plans to depart from work have been shown in studies. In fact, workers in unsafe employment environments are more probable to voluntarily leave and if the institution does nothing to improve working conditions, employees will not abandon their intentions to separate (Cottini et al., 2011). This study is showing the benefit of labour relations, particularly for companies that want to hold on to their workforce because, according to Bertrand and Hansez (2010) businesses must also assure the preservation of talent and continue to develop proficiency. Undeniably, the high price of employee turnover in relation to recruiting and upskilling is a key challenge for companies. The monetary loss caused may range from a small amount to more than double the remuneration of the employee and the unfavorable effects are important on organizational efficacy and group morale (Singh and Loncar, 2010).

Working environments, such as succession intentions, may have different effects on the outcomes of workers. Different studies have shown that apparent working conditions can influence turnover decisions on diverse working groups Huang et al., (2007); Burakova et al., (2014); Houkes et al., (2001); Poilpot-Rocaboy et al., (2011); Podsakoff et al., (2007). Mueller and Price (1990) have identified the psychological, sociological and economic essence of the determinants of voluntary turnover. Their voluntary turnover explanatory model combines various forms of factors, such as characteristics of the employee, conditions they work in and the condition of the environment. The authors opinion is that if the aspirations of workers are not met, as a result of job dis-satisfaction and dedication to work will lead workers choosing to separate from the institute.

On the same subject, Dawis and Lofquist (1984) claimed that the level of satisfaction from both the employee's and the employer's perspective predict the extent to which the person is likely to remain. This model predicts types of changes between the two in the event of a disparity among the individual and the working environment. Therefore, individual development means that employee is attempting to modify the environment they are working in. Some employees may also reactively try to modify and alter their actions to best balance the climate. The employee leaves the job when no further change proves possible. Cognitive behavioral variables are intermediaries that holds the connection between satisfaction and employee turnover, as stated by Mobley et al., (1978)'s model. This theoretical model defines the cognitive process in which work displeasure causes the person to first think about leaving, secondly to prepare to leave, and actively quest for better prospects, finally choosing to leave if a motivating opportunity is offered.

Mobley (1977) differentiates the purpose of finding a new work opportunity and the decision to quit and states that except in cases of impulsive conduct, the intention of looking for and the subsequent opportunity search normally takes precedence over the decision to leave the organization and definite turnover. Job frustration is a factor leading to new solutions being sought by the worker (Peake and McDowall, 2012). There have been other descriptive factors found. Withdrawal intentions with new processes were clarified by Mitchell et al. (2001), incorporating variables that affect the choice to depart, such as dedication and satisfaction, the difference between the present and the upcoming circumstances, and the existence of actual events. The effect of work satisfaction and dedication on repeal intentions has been verified by several studies (Cossette and Gosselin, 2009). The mild negative association between turnover and satisfaction, as well as the adverse connection between engagement and turnover, has been illustrated by numerous authors such as Mobley et al., (1979); Porter and Steers, (1973). In a learning carried out using maintenance specialists, Maghni (2014) identified that turnover intention is clarified by 34.7% employment satisfaction (inherent and external) and 12.6% organization commitment.

 

Reference 

Carley, K. (1992). Organizational Learning and Personnel Turnover. Organization Science, 3(1), pp.20–46. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.20.

Chester, D. (2017). Consequences of Selecting Poorly | Dixon Appointments. [online] www.dixonappointments.com.au. Available at: https://www.dixonappointments.com.au/page/employers/recruit-news/consequences-of-selecting-poorly/.

‌Gerhart, B. (1990). Voluntary turnover and alternative job opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), pp.467–476. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.467.

IceHrm. (2020). Causes for a Poor Recruitment. [online] Available at: https://icehrm.com/blog/causes-for-a-poor-recruitment/.

ICHIMURA, A., 2021. Long Working Hours Kills More People in Southeast Asia Than Any Other Region. [online] esquire. Available at: <https://www.esquiremag.ph/money/industry/deaths-by-long-working-hours-a00304-20210519> [Accessed 7 May 2022].

Ilo.org. (2018). Employment in Asia-Pacific continues to grow but often remains of poor quality. [online] Available at: https://www.ilo.org/asia/media-centre/news/WCMS_615872/lang--en/index.htm.

Lee Larson, L. (2004). Internal auditors and job stress. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(9), pp.1119–1130. doi:10.1108/02686900410562768.

Lipman, V. (2019). 36% Of Employees Say Lack Of Recognition Is Top Reason To Leave Their Job. [online] Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/victorlipman/2019/03/01/36-of-employees-say-lack-of-recognition-is-top-reason-to-leave-their-job/?sh=5d7676e845b4 [Accessed 6 May 2022].

Live Career UK. (n.d.). Lack Of Career Progression | LiveCareer. [online] Available at: https://www.livecareer.co.uk/templates/tips/career-progression.

Morrell, K.M., Loan‐Clarke, J. and Wilkinson, A.J. (2004). Organisational change and employee turnover. Personnel Review, 33(2), pp.161–173. doi:10.1108/00483480410518022.

Nelson, N. (2021). Identifying and Addressing Employee Turnover Issues. [online] www.wolterskluwer.com. Available at: https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/identifying-and-addressing-employee-turnover-issues.

peoplehum. (n.d.). Overcoming HR challenges in a diverse South East Asia. [online] Available at: https://www.peoplehum.com/blog/overcoming-hr-challenges-in-a-diverse-south-east-asia [Accessed 6 May 2022].‌

Smith, M. and Cooper, C. (1994). Leadership and Stress. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 15(2), pp.3–7. doi:10.1108/01437739410055290.

When I Work Organization. (2022). 5 Signs Your Employees Are Overworked | When I Work. [online] Available at: https://wheniwork.com/blog/overworked-employees#:~:text=More%20work%2C%20less%20return%20for [Accessed 6 May 2022].







Comments

  1. It is great to observe that you have mentioned about theories like human capital theory to identify various significant factors affecting the employee turnover. There was a great learning although other sectors are different. It was great personally as well because the post had talked about lack of opportunities and they need to grow as an employee

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Anusha ,Having access to career growth and development opportunities is a desire of most employees. They want to continue to develop and grow their skills. They would also like to have opportunities to function in a variety of roles and advance to higher levels within the organization. If they are not able to grow, develop, and be promoted at their current company or organization, they will seek employment elsewhere leaving companies with gaps to fill. The benefit of advancement opportunities in a company is a significant contributor to employee retention. A retention strategy is ineffective without the opportunity for career growth.

      Delete
  2. very well describe Sushini. I think employees do have the opportunity to change some employees, minds and reduce future turnover by taking records of their current health and wellness benefit offering an making adjustments to address what employees are looking for. Simply it is highlighted that Employees wellbeing has s strong connection with the turn over rate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it is important for companies to invest in employee wellness programs to ensure that they are caring for their employees and looking out for their physical health, mental health and overall well-being. In turn, companies will be able to keep their good employees for longer, attract good new employees, and their employees will enjoy working at their company for many years.

      Delete
  3. Nice elaborating. Work life balance too help employees in order to change their mind and leave the organization. Always when employees are satisfied they tend to stay and they feel stable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Employers must be responsive to the wants of employees. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, research found that nearly a third of workers sought out a new job because their current workplace didn't offer flexible work opportunities. After 2020, many workplaces have remote work and flexible scheduling options that have been put to the test. and its currently in practice for most of the global service centers after COVID 19 pandemic

      Delete
  4. Good post Sushini
    I think Workplace flexibility is a key factor for employee turnover because Workplace flexibility emphasizes the willingness and ability to adapt to change, particularly regarding how and when work gets done

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes tharindu it is one of the factors which will have a major impact idea is that those who know how to get a better work-life balance will be more happy and satisfied with both elements of their life, and therefore be able to thrive in both areas.
      If you can help create a healthy work-life balance for employees in your company, this will provide a number of benefits to your business, including:
      • Better staff retention
      • Increased productivity
      • Higher employee engagement
      • Increased morale
      • Reduced absenteeism

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

1. Introduction

2. Review of Key concepts